1 |
On Mittwoch 12 November 2008, jevezze@××××××××××××.com wrote: |
2 |
> Op Wednesday 12 November 2008 21:05:09 schreef Volker Armin Hemmann: |
3 |
> > On Mittwoch 12 November 2008, jevezze@××××××××××××.com wrote: |
4 |
> > > Hi, |
5 |
> > > |
6 |
> > > I was wondering if someone could help me out here. |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > > My boottime right now is +- 1 minute but I see alot of blogs and such |
9 |
> > > saying poeple have less then 20 seconds? I've tried things like |
10 |
> > > baselayout 2.0, Openrc and changing RC_PARALLEL_STARTUP to 'yes' |
11 |
> > > instead of 'no' but I can't see any difference. Are there more things I |
12 |
> > > could try? |
13 |
> > > |
14 |
> > > Ow and for some reason bootchart doesn't work I placed it in my grub |
15 |
> > > conf but it doesn't show any log and is not stated in my dmesg except |
16 |
> > > in the first to lines where it just copies my grub commands? |
17 |
> > > |
18 |
> > > Even 5 or 10 secondes less would be pretty cool :-). |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > take out everything out of your kernel what you don't need. Not even as |
21 |
> > module. Reduce the amount of modules. Don't use genkernel. Have X start |
22 |
> > in the boot runlevel. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Thanks, |
25 |
> |
26 |
> I allready took everything out of my kernel but is there a big difference |
27 |
> with modules or buildin's ? And X allready starts at boot. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> And why shouldn't I use genkernel? |
30 |
|
31 |
with 'don't use genkernel' I meant 'don't use an initrd' - because it adds a |
32 |
lot of time to the boot. And with everything essential in the kernel it is a |
33 |
useless waste of time. But even if you don't use genkernel to create an initrd |
34 |
- there is no reason to use it at all. With debianutils installed make all |
35 |
modules_install install is all that is needed to compile a kernel, install the |
36 |
modules, copy it to /boot and create vmlinuz and vmlinuz, System.map and |
37 |
config sysmlinks. |