| 1 |
2008/1/30, Volker Armin Hemmann <volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de>: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2008, Beso wrote: |
| 4 |
> > 2008/1/30, Volker Armin Hemmann <volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de>: |
| 5 |
> > > On Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2008, Beso wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > > 2008/1/30, Volker Armin Hemmann < |
| 7 |
> volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de>: |
| 8 |
> > > > > aren't bug reports with --as-needed closed as invalid per default? |
| 9 |
> > > > |
| 10 |
> > > > they might be, but the fact is that the flag is good and working |
| 11 |
> well. |
| 12 |
> > > |
| 13 |
> > > if you can't report bugs, a flag is not good. |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > for what i know a bug is a bug when you have tested that it doesn't |
| 16 |
> present |
| 17 |
> > on an all-stable system. to report a bug just remove the flag and see |
| 18 |
> what |
| 19 |
> > hapens. if it's still there then the bug is present. i don't see the |
| 20 |
> > difficulty. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> you not only have to remove the flag but to rebuild the complete system. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
this thing doesn't results to me. but this is not a problem since till now i |
| 26 |
haven't got any problem with it, but only satisfactions. i'm not here to |
| 27 |
force anyone on having it, but since it is just widely accepted as not |
| 28 |
problematic and since i haven't got any problems with it, then there's no |
| 29 |
harm in advising people to use it. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
> gentoo-amd64@l.g.o mailing list |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
dott. ing. beso |
Archives