| 1 |
On Freitag 21 November 2008, Tonko wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> <volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Freitag 21 November 2008, Tonko Mulder wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> I was wondering since flash has been released for x86_64 and simply |
| 7 |
> >> can't find a program on my laptop which uses emul-linux-x86-* |
| 8 |
> >> If I could just move to a no-multilib profile. |
| 9 |
> >> |
| 10 |
> >> As I've read, life get's easier with the no-multilib profile. :) |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > why? what is easier - from a user POV of removing multilib? |
| 13 |
> > You might hit a scenario where you need some 32bit app soon - and despite |
| 14 |
> > Duncan's claim, not all 32bit apps are closed source. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Than I would have to choose to whether use the 32-bit chroot as Duncan |
| 17 |
> proposed or I could restore a backup of my current multilib system. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
and loose everything you did in the mean time. Really, what is the upside of |
| 20 |
removing multilib? |
Archives