| 1 |
Mark Haney posted <43E0CFAD.7040409@××××××××××××.org>, excerpted below, |
| 2 |
on Wed, 01 Feb 2006 10:11:41 -0500: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Then I stand corrected, and I apologize. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Let me do so as well. I was just rereading my (second) post, and it |
| 7 |
still could be taken as confrontational (blaming it on you), and didn't |
| 8 |
directly apologize, either. That's entirely my error. What the post said |
| 9 |
was factually correct, as was the first one, and, yes, no flaming intended |
| 10 |
as I don't choose to play those games, but it /still/ came across as |
| 11 |
blaming you for your viewpoint, which was /not/ my intention. IOW, |
| 12 |
certainly in my second post, and possibly in my first, I can now see how |
| 13 |
you /might/ take it as flaming or attack, and for that I totally and |
| 14 |
absolutely apologize, as truly, my belief is that there's not enough time |
| 15 |
in the world to waste it on non-useful things such as that. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
So, honestly, my intent was right, but sometimes we don't live upto our |
| 18 |
intents, and this was one such case. Thanks for taking it (the second |
| 19 |
time) as I intended, even if it /could/ have been taken otherwise! |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 23 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 24 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in |
| 25 |
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives