1 |
Volker Armin Hemmann posted on Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:31:27 +0200 as |
2 |
excerpted: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Monday 27 June 2011 03:26:59 Lie Ryan wrote: |
5 |
|
6 |
>> Anyone noticed that this list have a higher than normal tendency to |
7 |
>> bully those who tried to unsubscribe and failed? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> bully? No, make fun of people failing to follow basic instructions? |
10 |
> Maybe. But not more than gentoo-user... |
11 |
|
12 |
Exactly. |
13 |
|
14 |
1) Instructions are in the headers of every post. A simple view-headers |
15 |
is all that's required. |
16 |
|
17 |
2) Instructions are available at the same place they signed up, using a |
18 |
very similar procedure. It's not rocket science. If they could find and |
19 |
had the intelligence to subscribe (and even verify their subscription, |
20 |
the list IS double-opt-in, after all), unless they just had a stroke or |
21 |
some such, they should still be able to find and have the intelligence to |
22 |
unsubscribe. |
23 |
|
24 |
3) Simple reason says that if it's a gentoo list, going to the gentoo |
25 |
site and looking for the mailing list info would be an appropriate way to |
26 |
figure out how to unsubscribe. Even if they somehow lost all memory of |
27 |
the subscription process, simple reason remains the same, and indeed, the |
28 |
gentoo mailing list info can be found on the site exactly as one could |
29 |
expect. |
30 |
|
31 |
4) In this case, all they had to do was read the thread from a couple |
32 |
days ago, on the same subject. Simple netiquette has always expected |
33 |
that people follow a list or newsgroup for a bit before they ask what may |
34 |
well be a FAQ, and the same arguably applies here. They can't even read |
35 |
the existing thread from the last person who apparently had a stroke or |
36 |
something after he subscribed, losing all memory of the process, as well |
37 |
as the basic intelligence to reason where he might find unsubscribe |
38 |
instructions. |
39 |
|
40 |
So what's up with these people, anyway? Do they simply not even /care/ |
41 |
if they do it right? They obviously have the ability to follow that |
42 |
level of instructions or they'd not be subscribed in the first place, and |
43 |
it's unlikely ALL of them are stroke victims! Are they deliberately |
44 |
TRYING to look dumb? Maybe they just smoked too many mind altering drugs |
45 |
and it's now /permanently/ altered? |
46 |
|
47 |
So yeah, they do get a bit of fun poked at them. But along with that |
48 |
fun, they usually get the unsubscribe help they're apparently too dumb to |
49 |
find any of the /normal/ ways, or simply don't /care/ if they're |
50 |
bothering people by not following the easily available instructions. And |
51 |
if they don't care if they bother other subscribers, why should other |
52 |
subscribers care about poking a little fun their way even as they point |
53 |
them at the door? <shrug> |
54 |
|
55 |
-- |
56 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
57 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
58 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |