1 |
Mark Haney posted <43E0C369.9070902@××××××××××××.org>, excerpted below, |
2 |
on Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:19:21 -0500: |
3 |
|
4 |
> You know, personally, I really _dislike_ getting flamed from a post almost |
5 |
> a month old. For the record, I _have_ read the documentation. But for |
6 |
> those of us who've done this a long time, the documented way isn't always |
7 |
> the _best_ way. I asked only to see if there was another possibly better |
8 |
> method of handling configuration files. I was not aware of dispatch-conf |
9 |
> at the time as I had been using etc-update. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> I simply do not have time to re-read the documentation every other day to |
12 |
> keep up with those types of changes. If I did, I wouldn't have time to do |
13 |
> any work. |
14 |
|
15 |
First, no flaming intended. If you took it as a flame, I assure you it |
16 |
was only that due to your viewpoint. My viewpoint is as I stated, |
17 |
Gentoo is highly rated for its documentation, and it's a shame not to use |
18 |
it, but my urging you to do so isn't a flame, simply an honest face-value |
19 |
recommendation. |
20 |
|
21 |
Second, it doesn't appear to be a month old. The timestamp in both your |
22 |
original post and my reply which gives the time of the original post I'm |
23 |
replying to, says Jan 9, which is only ~3/4 month. That aside, however, |
24 |
your post is only now appearing here on gmane -- for what reason I can't |
25 |
say, but it appeared in the last <24 hours, along with a couple replies, |
26 |
as a /new/ post, and I responded to it as such, failing to note the date |
27 |
until you mentioned it. |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
31 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
32 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in |
33 |
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html |
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |