| 1 |
John C. Shimek wrote: |
| 2 |
> P.V.Anthony wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Hi, |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> What is the difference between "Athlon 64" and "Athlon 64 FX"? |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Does it really matter? I am using this on a nfs server. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> Please advise or point me to some links. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> P.V.Anthony |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> The original FX the FX-51 which I have was the 939 or 940 pin (Sorry |
| 15 |
> can't remember which) processor as opposed to the 768 pin or some such |
| 16 |
> number (Sorry I don't remember that either) The 939 started out as the |
| 17 |
> regulaer Operton with smp support disable to a degree if my memory is |
| 18 |
> right. The main advantage that I saw was that it had dual channel |
| 19 |
> memory support where the 768 pin only had single channel memory |
| 20 |
> support. Now things might have changed over the past 2 years and both |
| 21 |
> might have dual channel memory support now. I haven't stayed on top of |
| 22 |
> all the new processors since I am not in the market for a new one yet. |
| 23 |
> I purchased mine about 3 months after they where originally released. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Thank you to all of you for replying. The info was very helpful. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
P.V.Anthony |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives