1 |
I would fix your basic system, whatever causes you to say: |
2 |
|
3 |
As usual, portage can't find the ebuilds required and I've been |
4 |
downloading them manually. |
5 |
|
6 |
If portage can't download packages then you have a real problem. Others |
7 |
have suggested you run an emerge sync. After that, try the --fetchonly |
8 |
option for a simple package and get your downloads to work. |
9 |
|
10 |
I migrated from 2004.3 a few months ago using the automated upgrade and |
11 |
I had no problems that I remember. |
12 |
|
13 |
Good luck, |
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
Steve Herber herber@×××××.com work: 206-221-7262 |
17 |
Security Engineer, UW Medicine, IT Services home: 425-454-2399 |
18 |
|
19 |
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, Daiajo Tibdixious wrote: |
20 |
|
21 |
> I've been upgrading profile 2004.3 to 2005.0 using |
22 |
> /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/amd64/2005.0/scripts/2004.3- |
23 |
> 2005.0upgrade.sh |
24 |
> As usual, portage can't find the ebuilds required and I've been downloading |
25 |
> them manually. |
26 |
> I'm up to gentoo-headers which is failing with: |
27 |
> -- |
28 |
>>>> md5 src_uri ;-) linux-2.6.11.tar.bz2 |
29 |
>>>> md5 src_uri ;-) linux-2.6.11-m68k-headers.patch.bz2 |
30 |
>>>> md5 src_uri ;-) gentoo-headers-2.6.11-5.tar.bz2 |
31 |
> |
32 |
> * This version of linux-headers does not support i386_64. |
33 |
> * Please merge the appropriate sources, in most cases |
34 |
> * this will be i386_64-headers. |
35 |
> |
36 |
> !!! ERROR: sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.6.11-r2 failed. |
37 |
> !!! Function setup_headers, Line 358, Exitcode 0 |
38 |
> !!! incorrect headers |
39 |
> -- |
40 |
> I've tried googling for "I386_64_headers" and "version linux-headers support |
41 |
> i386_64" without finding anything relevant. |
42 |
> I got the ebuild, digest, etc from |
43 |
> http://ftp.belnet.be/linux/gentoo-portage/sys-kernel/linux-headers |
44 |
> which has worked well for other packages so far. |
45 |
> According to |
46 |
> http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=linux-headers |
47 |
> the latest stable amd64 version is 2.6.11-r2 so I'm confused as to why this |
48 |
> would be unsuitable. |
49 |
> |
50 |
> I'm a complete newbie to Linux & Gentoo, although I've been able to solve a |
51 |
> large number of problems by googling. |
52 |
> -- |
53 |
> daiajo@×××××.com |
54 |
> AMD Athlon 3000+ Gentoo 2004.3 Linux 2.6 |
55 |
-- |
56 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |