Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-amd64
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-amd64: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-amd64@g.o
From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@...>
Subject: Re: Is 2005 broken?
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 14:46:57 -0700
Tim Ames posted
<6.2.0.14.2.20050709130256.027253c8@...>, excerpted
below,  on Sat, 09 Jul 2005 13:05:25 -0700:

> Thanks for the reply.  I updated the bios on the sk8v with the beta version 
> that was posted on the asus website.
> 
> bad news got a cmos error.  Went through all the proper steps, called tech 
> at asus and I fried the bios chip they
> are sending me a new one, so next week I'll try this again.  But this was a 
> fresh install, fresh fdisk and I did the first emerge sync and this happened.

You've /gotta/ have something /seriously/ wrong with that thing!  MD5s
going crazy, a BIOS update failing (I've /never/ seen that happen unless
the power dies in the middle).  There's just too much weird stuff going on
for it to be anything but hardware!

Hopefully, it was the old BIOS, and an entirely new chip fixes it.  If
not, I'd consider switching boards or memory or CPU or SOMETHING!  If
that isn't possible, then yes, on that one, I'd say run a binary install
of /something/, because if it's that unstable, I can't believe you could
reliably compile stuff either, and if you can't do that, who's to say
/what/ you'll find yourself overwriting, so better go with precompiled
binaries.  Even then, you've no idea when it'll suddenly start overwriting
stuff on your disk, so be prepared to reinstall when needed, and keep
daily, even hourly, backups, to clean media each time so it can't
overwrite /that/ with crazy stuff!

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman in
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html


-- 
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list


Replies:
Re: Re: Is 2005 broken?
-- Nuitari
References:
Is 2005 broken?
-- Tim Ames
Re: Is 2005 broken?
-- Zac Medico
Re: Is 2005 broken?
-- Tim Ames
Re: Is 2005 broken?
-- Joerg Gollnick
Re: Is 2005 broken?
-- Tim Ames
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-amd64: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Is 2005 broken?
Next by thread:
Re: Re: Is 2005 broken?
Previous by date:
New AT
Next by date:
Re: Re: Is 2005 broken?


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-amd64 mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.