Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Is 2005 broken?
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 21:49:19
Message-Id: pan.2005.07.09.21.46.56.230882@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Is 2005 broken? by Tim Ames
1 Tim Ames posted
2 <6.2.0.14.2.20050709130256.027253c8@××××××××××××××××××.org>, excerpted
3 below, on Sat, 09 Jul 2005 13:05:25 -0700:
4
5 > Thanks for the reply. I updated the bios on the sk8v with the beta version
6 > that was posted on the asus website.
7 >
8 > bad news got a cmos error. Went through all the proper steps, called tech
9 > at asus and I fried the bios chip they
10 > are sending me a new one, so next week I'll try this again. But this was a
11 > fresh install, fresh fdisk and I did the first emerge sync and this happened.
12
13 You've /gotta/ have something /seriously/ wrong with that thing! MD5s
14 going crazy, a BIOS update failing (I've /never/ seen that happen unless
15 the power dies in the middle). There's just too much weird stuff going on
16 for it to be anything but hardware!
17
18 Hopefully, it was the old BIOS, and an entirely new chip fixes it. If
19 not, I'd consider switching boards or memory or CPU or SOMETHING! If
20 that isn't possible, then yes, on that one, I'd say run a binary install
21 of /something/, because if it's that unstable, I can't believe you could
22 reliably compile stuff either, and if you can't do that, who's to say
23 /what/ you'll find yourself overwriting, so better go with precompiled
24 binaries. Even then, you've no idea when it'll suddenly start overwriting
25 stuff on your disk, so be prepared to reinstall when needed, and keep
26 daily, even hourly, backups, to clean media each time so it can't
27 overwrite /that/ with crazy stuff!
28
29 --
30 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
31 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
32 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in
33 http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html
34
35
36 --
37 gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Is 2005 broken? Nuitari <nuitari@××××××××××××××××.net>