On Sunday 26 June 2011 13:36:22 Frank Peters wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:04:48 +0200
> 
> Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@...> wrote:
> > btw, have you tried ekopath? The compiler entered portage shortly after
> > its open sourcing? Maybe it is more correct. According to some it is
> > faster than gcc when it comes to math heavy workloads.
> 
> I took a look at it in the past and it was proprietary.  But looking
> again I see that it is in portage as a binary package.  I'll check it
> out for sure.
> 
> The Intel compiler was always an interest of mine but it can run
> on only Gentoo multilib.
> 
> Then there is LLVM which I am not sure about.  I'll have to research
> this one.
> 
> Frank Peters

ok, I tried ekopath:

UCBFAIL indicates problems!
/tmp/usbtest/ccos_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in COS(X) at line 444 for generic 
/tmp/usbtest/cexp_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in EXP(X) at line 444 for generic 
/tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in ceild at line 701 for double 
/tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in coshd at line 701 for double 
/tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in floord at line 701 for double 
/tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output:UCBFAIL clib_DP.output , 25 out of 25 tests 
completed
/tmp/usbtest/csin_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in SIN(X) at line 444 for generic 

only 10 out of 14 show UCBPASS!


options:
make="make"
cpp="cpp -traditional"
#cc=gcc
cc=/opt/ekopath-bin-4.0.10_pre20110612/bin/pathcc
#fcc=gfortran
f77=/opt/ekopath-bin-4.0.10_pre20110612/bin/pathf90
opts="-m64 -O2 -pipe -march=k8"


-- 
#163933