On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote:
> On Friday 30 May 2008 22:10:00 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote:
> > oh really?
> >
> > I don't think so.
>
> You also "think" that
> * it's Paludis's fault that the maintainers of some of the overlays I use
> chose to commit eclasses with the same names as those in the tree
> * package.mask syntax, that I explicitly stated was supported by Portage
> when I first mentioned it, is invalid
>
> Please forgive me if I don't find your li^W"opinions" very compelling.

you just call me liar - but you do nothing to prove that. On the mean time, I 
gave you some links.

So, in my opinion, you are just a pro-paludis troll.

And from what I can see, trolls are the prefered audience and power behind 
paludis.
-- 
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list