Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-amd64
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-amd64: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-amd64@g.o
From: Daniel Gryniewicz <dang@g.o>
Subject: Re: gtk+ keeps changing from a version to another ...
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:47:42 -0500
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 09:31 +0100, Jonathan Schaeffer wrote:
> Thanks for these informations, as a matter of fact I use xfce4 and
> don't mind about new version of gnome. Still I forced  gtk+ on latest
> stable version and it works now well.
> How did you find this dependency out ? the xfce ebuilds doesn't
> mention about gtk+
> 
> About the texmaker issue, it seems that there is a problem with
> qt4.0.1 and qt4.1.0 ... I'm investigating further.
> 
> ciao
> 

I did a grep in the ebuilds for x11-lib/gtk+-2.6, which is the depend
atom that would enforce that requirement.  If you're looking for
installed packages (as you would be, I don't have xfce installed) you
could use equery d instead of grep, which should be a lot faster.  (you
also need to look for <x11-lib/gtk-2.8 in general, to be complete, but
there aren't any of those in the tree.)

Daniel
Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part)
References:
gtk+ keeps changing from a version to another ...
-- Jonathan Schaeffer
Re: gtk+ keeps changing from a version to another ...
-- Daniel Gryniewicz
Re: gtk+ keeps changing from a version to another ...
-- Jonathan Schaeffer
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-amd64: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: gtk+ keeps changing from a version to another ...
Next by thread:
Fwd: [gentoo-user] xorg-x11 and gnome
Previous by date:
updating world
Next by date:
Re: updating world


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-amd64 mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.