1 |
Mark Knecht wrote: |
2 |
> 2010/12/9 Mateusz Arkadiusz Mierzwinski<mateuszmierzwinski@×××××.com>: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Dale, I tell You one thing - choose multilib. This don't do nothing wrong. |
5 |
>> You can use 32-bit app compatibility and this don't reduce performance of |
6 |
>> overall system. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
> Agreed. I think the only downside is _slightly_ slower emerge times |
9 |
> which with modern processors like Dale is going to use shouldn't be |
10 |
> much of an issue at all. I don't know of any other negative side |
11 |
> effects. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Cheers, |
14 |
> Mark |
15 |
> |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
Again, things are in flux here. You folks may have to look at time |
19 |
stamps to see where my brain is at any given point. |
20 |
|
21 |
It sounds like I need to go multilib for now and when everything gets |
22 |
sorted out for pure 64 bit, then switch to pure 64. I say this because |
23 |
I can switch from mulitlib to no-multilib without reinstalling. The |
24 |
reverse is not the case and requires a re-install. Correct? |
25 |
|
26 |
I'm glad I came on here and asked questions now. O_O |
27 |
|
28 |
Dale |
29 |
|
30 |
:-) :-) |
31 |
|
32 |
P. S. I got more replies to read. Watch me change my mind again. lol |