Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On Thursday 05 October 2006 05:16, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 18:32 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 October 2006 18:25, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote:
> > > My mail reader shows Patric's
> > > original email to be a sub-thread of a previous email with a different
> > > subject, but I would say that this is a bug in Evolution, not that
> > > hijacking has occurred.
> >
> > Huh? It shows as a subthread because of this header:
> > > References: <200610030946.31015.gentoo@...>
> > > <200610031443.37094.bss03@...>
> >
> > Not because of the Subject header...
>
> I don't know about you, but I don't look at headers like References. So,
> if the subject differ and the mailer says one is a reply to the other, I
> consider that a bug.
>
> ---- Vladimir
no, it is the correct behaviour.
The subject is not a good way to determine, that a mail belong in a thread or
not. RE, Re [RE], {AW}. is only one thing that changes in the subject.
Looking at the header is 'the standard', a mailer not doing it is inherently
broken.
And taking over threads, because you are too lazy to click on 'new mail' is
even more broken.
--
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list
|
|
