1 |
On Tuesday 07 February 2006 22:56, Duncan wrote: |
2 |
> Harm Geerts posted <200602072132.10945.harmgeerts@××××.nl>, excerpted |
3 |
> |
4 |
> below, on Tue, 07 Feb 2006 21:32:10 +0100: |
5 |
> > Oops, wrong list. |
6 |
> > Obviously where I said x86 it should be amd64 :) |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Wow! Thanks for the clarification! I was /totally/ lost for a moment, as |
9 |
> I simply couldn't follow your "assume you are running ~x86" thought |
10 |
> process /at/ /all/! =8^) |
11 |
At the time I was writing the reply I *thought* it was going to gentoo-user. |
12 |
Assuming someone is running x86 has a bigger chance of success there :-) |
13 |
|
14 |
> I'm very relieved to see it wasn't me going bonkers after all! It can be |
15 |
> pretty distressing when words that normally have meaning, in a sentence |
16 |
> structure that still has meaning, from a poster that usually knows what |
17 |
> he's talking about, suddenly fails to make any sense /whatsoever/. |
18 |
I'm just playing mind tricks, gotta keep those senses active. |
19 |
|
20 |
> Sometimes, there's a similar effect when I doze off at the computer and |
21 |
> drift between dreaming and awake, and stuff from the dreams enters the |
22 |
> semi-waking state and I realize it doesn't make sense but can't exactly |
23 |
> say why... until I wake up. Actually, there have been a couple times |
24 |
> I didn't realize something couldn't have /actually/ happened the way I |
25 |
> /thought/ I remembered it, until later. Only I checked myself and I |
26 |
> didn't /think/ I was asleep for /this/ one... unless I was dreaming the |
27 |
> entire thing... |
28 |
> |
29 |
> So... yes, it's a BIG relief to find it wasn't me, and actually make sense |
30 |
> of things again! You had me *VERY* mixed up, for a few moments. |
31 |
It's my pleasure, I'm sure you'll be able to return the favor to me some |
32 |
day ;-) |
33 |
-- |
34 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |