Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On Thu, 10 May 2012 15:07:09 +0200
Benny Pedersen <me@...> wrote:
>
> why not ext4 ?, imho ext4 is more caple of so big drives, specially on
> fsck, my own qnap ts 419 p+ supports both so it must be good :=)
>
My plan for the drive is long-term and portable storage of digital files.
The idea is basically write once, read many. Also, the drive has been
formatted into several smaller partitions. For this kind of use I don't
need the capabilities of ext4. In fact I don't even need a journal and
could probably use ext2 just as well.
Frank Peters
|
|
