1 |
On Thu, 10 May 2012 15:07:09 +0200 |
2 |
Benny Pedersen <me@××××.org> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> |
5 |
> why not ext4 ?, imho ext4 is more caple of so big drives, specially on |
6 |
> fsck, my own qnap ts 419 p+ supports both so it must be good :=) |
7 |
> |
8 |
|
9 |
My plan for the drive is long-term and portable storage of digital files. |
10 |
The idea is basically write once, read many. Also, the drive has been |
11 |
formatted into several smaller partitions. For this kind of use I don't |
12 |
need the capabilities of ext4. In fact I don't even need a journal and |
13 |
could probably use ext2 just as well. |
14 |
|
15 |
Frank Peters |