Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: Fragmentation (Was: Re: Re: Re: Wow! KDE 3.5.1 & Xorg 7.0 w/ Composite)
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:59:48
Message-Id: 7573e9640602140955u7fed5372g17d6c474a7377859@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: Fragmentation (Was: Re: Re: Re: Wow! KDE 3.5.1 & Xorg 7.0 w/ Composite) by Peter Humphrey
1 On 2/14/06, Peter Humphrey <prh@××××××××××.uk> wrote:
2 > I did that some time ago in a simple-minded fashion, but I've had to revise
3 > my layout somewhat. I had an ext3 partition solely for /usr/portage, and it
4 > was mounted on that node, but every emerge --sync deleted the /lost+found
5 > directory. I don't know how serious that is, but of course no-one likes to
6
7 Losing lost+found on an ext3 filesystem is pretty harmless. It is the
8 directory where fsck will attach files that still exist but were
9 detached from the directory tree (i.e, 'lost'). Since this should
10 *never* happen with ext3, there doesn't seem to be any point in
11 lost+found.
12
13 The one exception would be if you sometimes mount the filesystem as ext2.
14
15 I always "tune2fs -c0 ..." my ext3 filesystems.
16
17 -Richard
18
19 --
20 gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list

Replies