1 |
William Tetrault wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>I too have been on the amd64 platform since early last year, and am still |
4 |
>using grub-static, although I know that grub now compiles fine for this |
5 |
>platform (at least, that is what I've heard - I'm still using grub-static). |
6 |
>But whether one uses grub or grub-static, the installed files are the same, |
7 |
>and grub works the same regardless of which is chosen. My grub.conf has not |
8 |
>changed from when I was using Athlon XP's (although it's no longer called |
9 |
>grub.lst). |
10 |
> |
11 |
>On Sunday 30 October 2005 12:07 pm, Dmitri Pogosyan wrote: |
12 |
> |
13 |
> |
14 |
>>Actually, that reminds me that a year ago on amd64 architecture the |
15 |
>>compiled grub did not work for me (it did compile but fail to boot) and I |
16 |
>>had to use grub-static-0.93, which worked fine. I looked now and see that |
17 |
>>I still use this version of grub on all my amd64 machines. |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> |
21 |
Hi, shall I try 'emerge unmerge grub' and 'emerge grub-static'? Then |
22 |
'install-grub' to start the system using the static ver/ |
23 |
|
24 |
This seems v. promising. |
25 |
|
26 |
Gavin. |
27 |
|
28 |
>> |
29 |
>>-- |
30 |
>>Dmitri Pogosyan Department of Physics |
31 |
>>Associate Professor University of Alberta |
32 |
>>tel 1-780-492-2150 412 Avadh Bhatia Physics Labs |
33 |
>>fax 1-780-492-0714 Edmonton, AB, T6G 2J1, CANADA |
34 |
>> |
35 |
>> |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |