| 1 |
2010/9/21 Graham Murray <gmurray@××××××××××××.uk>: |
| 2 |
> Frank Peters <frank.peters@×××××××.net> writes: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> After doing my periodical emerge update, I notice that gcc-4.5.1 is |
| 5 |
>> now unmasked and presumably stable. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Are we looking at the same tree? I have just sync'd and gcc-4.5.1 is |
| 8 |
> still listed in /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask and |
| 9 |
> packages.gentoo.org still shows it masked for all arches. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I still see 4.5.1 hardmasked as well, despite a new sync. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Regardless, I add that when graphite was still the coolest things |
| 16 |
since sliced bread (when 4.4 first came out, IIRC), I tried it out |
| 17 |
locally. |
| 18 |
I think there was a few build issues, but nothing major, and those |
| 19 |
could be fixed since long now. |
Archives