Back on to a different subject...has anyone looked at the libm
section?  I am curious as to how much of a performance increase that
would add if we can get it working.

On 7/23/05, Ian McCulloch <ianmcc@...> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Matt Randolph wrote:
> 
> > Sean Johnson wrote:
> >
> > > LOL!
> > > That must be for the folk that don't mind patching glibc, but will get
> > > upset if memcpy does strange things. :)
> > >
> > >
> >
> > You try to do a good turn and they laugh at you.  That'll teach me.
> 
> Heh ;-)  I would like to see a version of memcpy.c that DOES do something
> malicious, without being completely obvious.  This isn't Windows, a
> seg-fault isn't going to take down the kernel, or corrupt the filesystem;)
> 
> Cheers
> Ian
> --
> gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list
> 
>

-- 
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list