Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Jared Lindsay <cinder.sub@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 18:48:18
Message-Id: e16d914c0507311146579d90e9@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc. by Ben Skeggs
1 Yeah, netcat, hehe.
2
3 emerge -pv netcat
4 ...
5 [ebuild N ] net-analyzer/netcat
6 [110-r8] -GAPING_SECURITY_HOLE +crypt -ipv6
7 -static 107 kB
8
9 I would be interested in a USE flag for this glibc patch.
10
11 On 7/31/05, Ben Skeggs <darktama@×××××××××.au> wrote:
12 > Duncan wrote:
13 >
14 > >Brian Hall posted <20050731085600.65fc8657.brihall@××××××.net>, excerpted
15 > >below, on Sun, 31 Jul 2005 08:56:00 -0600:
16 > >
17 > >
18 > >
19 > >>Perhaps a USE flag could be created to enable the glibc patches, then a
20 > >>emerge --newuse could recompile glibc and the problem apps (or
21 > >>everything); maybe a mini-howto document would also be helpful.
22 > >>
23 > >>I would certainly like an easy way to enable any "free" performance
24 > >>boost I can get!
25 > >>
26 > >>
27 > >
28 > >Something like USE=dangerous-amd64-hack? <g>
29 > >
30 > >(Seriously, there at least used to be a local use flag
31 > >USE=frickin-big-security-hole, or some such, on some app I can't remember
32 > >at the moment. Turns out a teacher was using that app in his class as a
33 > >an example or something, so the dev left the ability to create it there,
34 > >but with a USE flag nobody in their right mind would normally enable. I
35 > >wish I could remember what it was, but grepping use.local.desc for
36 > >anything that might be related doesn't seem to bring it up. Perhaps the
37 > >app, or anyway the USE flag, has now been removed from portage?)
38 > >
39 > >The use.local.desc description could point to the bug, which is IIRC what
40 > >the one above did, for those wanting more information about just why such
41 > >a USE flag exists, and just why someone might be persuaded to enable it.
42 > >
43 > >
44 > >
45 > Are you talking about GAPING_SECURITY_HOLE? If so, this flag is still
46 > in use by the net-analyzer/netcat package. It enables the "-E" (iirc)
47 > switch
48 > which allows you to do something like:
49 > nc -l -p 12345 -E /bin/bash
50 >
51 > This(or something close to it) would cause netcat to listen on port 12345,
52 > and forward the person who connects to it a nice bash shell.
53 >
54 > Ben.
55 > --
56 > gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list
57 >
58 >
59
60 --
61 gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc. Nuitari <nuitari@××××××××××××××××.net>