| 1 |
Lie Ryan posted on Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:20:45 +1100 as excerpted: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On 09/29/10 03:03, Zhu Sha Zang wrote: |
| 4 |
>> I have some machines running gentoo and every machine running under |
| 5 |
>> AMD Processors (64-bit profile), everything is right. Every source code |
| 6 |
>> compile fine. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> But, some machines, i've installed under Intel Core 2 Quad or i7 |
| 9 |
>> processor and this machines have problem compile especific 2 packages: |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
>> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64" |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I doubt you would want that. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Why not? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
That statement implies that you don't either don't understand what |
| 18 |
keywords are all about, or you don't understand what that specific keyword |
| 19 |
means. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
If the statement is taken in the one context, if he's running the 64-bit |
| 22 |
x86 instruction set, on Gentoo, the keyword for it is amd64, regardless of |
| 23 |
who (AMD, Intel, Via...) makes the chip it's running on. For one thing, |
| 24 |
Gentoo's support for that instruction set originated before anyone else |
| 25 |
had picked it up, and AMD called it AMD64.[1] |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
That's why this list is the gentoo/amd64 list as well, because that's what |
| 28 |
Gentoo calls the arch/instruction-set, regardless of who creates the |
| 29 |
hardware. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Unless of course you're arguing that he likely wants ~amd64 instead, |
| 32 |
which /is/ something that could be argued (I run ~amd64 on my 64-bit |
| 33 |
machine and ~x86 on my 32-bit-only Atom netbook...). But that's going to |
| 34 |
require a /lot/ more than a simple "I doubt you would want that" in |
| 35 |
reference to the stable version, to back up /that/ argument, to the point |
| 36 |
I can't see anyone logically making the claim you made in that context, |
| 37 |
either. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
---- |
| 40 |
[1] For another, AMD originated it, and that's what they call it, so it |
| 41 |
can be argued that is it's "proper" name, even if generically, x86_64 also |
| 42 |
often used (as it is for the kernel, but due to the _ it's harder to |
| 43 |
type), or x64 (which is confusing for a few reasons, not the least of |
| 44 |
which is that 64 is less than 86, but it's the newer and arguably "better" |
| 45 |
instruction set, but I do think MS uses it), or by Intel as em64t or some |
| 46 |
such. |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
-- |
| 49 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 50 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 51 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives