List Archive: gentoo-amd64
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
Stan Sander wrote:
> Wednesday 08 December 2010
>> Glad you posted this. I looked at the USE flags for grub not a package
>> called grub-static. That seems to be two different beasts. I never
>> knew that package existed. Would emerging the plain grub with the
>> static USE flag give the same results? I would think not else they
>> would just have one package but am curious just the same.
> No, the static use flag in grub does not do the same thing. If you run a no-multilib profile (in other words pure 64-bit) you need to run grub-static if you are going to use grub as a boot loader. As Frank said, lilo is still maintained and is a viable choice. So that's what it comes down to, your choices -- lilo or grub, multilib or no-multilib. Personally I've run no-multilib for some time now and have not ever wished otherwise since I made the switch. If you run a multilib profile, you can use the regular grub package (or lilo) with whatever USE flags suit your needs. You can also use grub-static in a multilib profile. If you select the no-multilib profile grub will be hard masked.
New info so a new decision. I plan to go no-multilib so looks like I
will be using grub-static after all. Please disregard the post I sent a
few seconds ago saying I would try the plain grub first. ;-)
Still have no desire to use lilo. lol