Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Barry Schwartz
<chemoelectric@...> wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@...> skribis:
>> ok, I tried ekopath:
>>
>> UCBFAIL indicates problems!
>> /tmp/usbtest/ccos_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in COS(X) at line 444 for generic
>> /tmp/usbtest/cexp_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in EXP(X) at line 444 for generic
>> /tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in ceild at line 701 for double
>> /tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in coshd at line 701 for double
>> /tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in floord at line 701 for double
>> /tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output:UCBFAIL clib_DP.output , 25 out of 25 tests
>> completed
>> /tmp/usbtest/csin_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in SIN(X) at line 444 for generic
>>
>> only 10 out of 14 show UCBPASS!
>
> That must be what they mean by "Industry proven robustness and
> quality"
Do you have any info about _any_ system passing this 100% successfully?
What about that the code itself might have a bug in it?
- Mark
|
|
