| 1 |
Graham Murray posted on Tue, 21 Sep 2010 08:27:38 +0100 as excerpted: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Frank Peters <frank.peters@×××××××.net> writes: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> After doing my periodical emerge update, I notice that gcc-4.5.1 is now |
| 6 |
>> unmasked and presumably stable. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Are we looking at the same tree? I have just sync'd and gcc-4.5.1 is |
| 9 |
> still listed in /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask and |
| 10 |
> packages.gentoo.org still shows it masked for all arches. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Hmm, so it is. I have gcc set ** in package.keywords, and gcc-4.5* in |
| 13 |
package.unmask. Perhaps he has gcc (or >=gcc-4.4 or some such) in |
| 14 |
package.unmask, but ~amd64 in package.keywords, which would account for |
| 15 |
his seeing it only when it was keyworded, tho it was still hard-masked. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Or maybe something happened and it was temporarily unmasked for a few |
| 18 |
hours, and he happened to sync during that period? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 22 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 23 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives