Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-amd64
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-amd64: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-amd64@g.o
From: Sean Johnson <gutenpress@...>
Subject: Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 21:47:27 -0400
LOL! 

That must be for the folk that don't mind patching glibc, but will get
upset if memcpy does strange things. :)

On 7/23/05, Matt Randolph <mattr@...> wrote:
> Oh, and I take no responsibility for any damages to anyone or anything
> arising from the use of the revised memcpy.c or software produced from
> it.  It may contain further errors that I don't know about.
> 
> Matt Randolph wrote:
> 
> > There is a bug in the original memcpy.c that will cause a segfault if
> > you don't pass it any parameters.  Here is a fixed version.  I've left
> > everything else alone (except for a spelling correction).
> 
> 
> 
> --
> "Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate" - W. of O.
> 
> --
> gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list
> 
>

-- 
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list


Replies:
Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
-- Matt Randolph
References:
x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
-- Simon Strandman
Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
-- Matt Randolph
Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
-- Matt Randolph
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-amd64: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
Next by thread:
Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
Previous by date:
Re: controlling processor peaks
Next by date:
no sound


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-amd64 mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.