1 |
Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
2 |
> On Wednesday 01 March 2006 17:40, Michal Žeravík wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> On Wednesday 01 March 2006 17:17, Michal Žeravík wrote: |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>>> Hi all, |
9 |
>>>> |
10 |
>>>> anyone know how to get %subj% on native gentoo64? |
11 |
>>>> Kernel has partial write support, captive-ntfs seems to be x86 only. |
12 |
>>>> Is there any way? |
13 |
>>>> |
14 |
>>> Write support is currently working best with the ntfs-progs / fuse combo. |
15 |
>>> The version in portage is not current though, and the new version is |
16 |
>>> probably better. You must have a fuse enabled kernel though. |
17 |
>>> |
18 |
>>> Paul |
19 |
>>> |
20 |
>> from linux-ntfs.org: |
21 |
>> *Write support:* Last, but not least, the kernel driver now does all |
22 |
>> sorts of mambo jumbo when mounting a volume R/W. Features come slower |
23 |
>> than ntfsmount (fuse) but much more stable. |
24 |
>> |
25 |
>> So RW use of kernel-driver is now really reliable? (using 2.6.15-gentoo-r5) |
26 |
>> Or better to use ntfsprogs/fuse? |
27 |
>> |
28 |
> |
29 |
> The kernel is very reliable and will certainly not destroy your data, or even |
30 |
> require a chkdsk from windows. It does however support writing less often. |
31 |
> For both modes, writing is enabled, but does not always succeed. Whether or |
32 |
> not it succeeds is dependent on the structure of the directory the file is to |
33 |
> be written into. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Paul |
36 |
> |
37 |
well, only thing to enable ntfs-rw is with CONFIG_NTFS_RW ? |
38 |
And writing couldn't lead to destroying data then? |
39 |
Writing fail won't damage target ntfs directory structure? |
40 |
If so, is it repairable with chkdsk? |
41 |
I don't like to not corrupt friends' ntfs filesystems. |
42 |
|
43 |
michal |