On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 09:13 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:

> I had a similar problem (actually with plain x86) a couple months ago.  
> That was with glibc-2.3.4.20040808-r1.

Yes that one. I've been unable to succesfully upgrade to 2.3.5 without
hitting the failure. However I left my system building a fresh partition
from scratch over the weekend - it managed to upgrade to 2.3.5 without a
problem. 

Something has obviously broken on my main partition that is preventing
the update. Perhaps the difference in ld.so.conf explain things?

malory linux-2.6.12.2 # diff
-ub /etc/ld.so.conf /mnt/sda1/etc/ld.so.conf
--- /etc/ld.so.conf     2005-07-17 13:48:21.000000000 +0000
+++ /mnt/sda1/etc/ld.so.conf    2005-07-14 22:10:29.000000000 +0000
@@ -10,12 +10,14 @@
 /usr/lib32
 /usr/local/lib32
 /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/lib
-/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3
-/usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.2
-/usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.2/32
-/usr//lib/MozillaFirefox
+/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/.
+/usr/lib/MozillaFirefox
 /usr/lib/mozilla
 /usr/lib
+/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.02/jre/lib/amd64/
+/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.02/jre/lib/amd64/native_threads/
+/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.02/jre/lib/amd64/classic/
+/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.02/jre/lib/amd64/server/
 /emul/linux/x86/lib
 /emul/linux/x86/usr/lib
 /usr/qt/3/lib


>   Lately I've been using glibc-2.3.5 with no problems.  What version do you have?
> 
> Zac
--
Alex, homepage: http://www.bennee.com/~alex/
Dungeons and Dragons is just a lot of Saxon Violence.

-- 
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list