1 |
Hi, if I cannot get grub towork. How do I go-about making the change to |
2 |
lilo? |
3 |
Thanks |
4 |
Gavin. |
5 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
Nuitari wrote: |
8 |
|
9 |
> I finally switched my only grub system to lilo yesterday. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, William Tetrault wrote: |
12 |
> |
13 |
>> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 13:24:30 -0600 |
14 |
>> From: William Tetrault <xcourse97@×××××××.net> |
15 |
>> Reply-To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o |
16 |
>> To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o |
17 |
>> Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] initrd |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>> I too have been on the amd64 platform since early last year, and am |
20 |
>> still |
21 |
>> using grub-static, although I know that grub now compiles fine for this |
22 |
>> platform (at least, that is what I've heard - I'm still using |
23 |
>> grub-static). |
24 |
>> But whether one uses grub or grub-static, the installed files are the |
25 |
>> same, |
26 |
>> and grub works the same regardless of which is chosen. My grub.conf |
27 |
>> has not |
28 |
>> changed from when I was using Athlon XP's (although it's no longer |
29 |
>> called |
30 |
>> grub.lst). |
31 |
>> |
32 |
>> On Sunday 30 October 2005 12:07 pm, Dmitri Pogosyan wrote: |
33 |
>> |
34 |
>>> Actually, that reminds me that a year ago on amd64 architecture the |
35 |
>>> compiled grub did not work for me (it did compile but fail to boot) |
36 |
>>> and I |
37 |
>>> had to use grub-static-0.93, which worked fine. I looked now and |
38 |
>>> see that |
39 |
>>> I still use this version of grub on all my amd64 machines. |
40 |
>>> |
41 |
>>> |
42 |
>>> |
43 |
>>> -- |
44 |
>>> Dmitri Pogosyan Department of Physics |
45 |
>>> Associate Professor University of Alberta |
46 |
>>> tel 1-780-492-2150 412 Avadh Bhatia Physics Labs |
47 |
>>> fax 1-780-492-0714 Edmonton, AB, T6G 2J1, CANADA |
48 |
>> |
49 |
>> |
50 |
|
51 |
-- |
52 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |