Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-amd64
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-amd64: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-amd64@g.o
From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@...>
Subject: Re: Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:42:58 -0700
Michael Edwards posted
<1122400181.27862.10.camel@...>, excerpted below, 
on Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:49:41 +0200:

> AMD Athlon 64 Processor 3000+ (745pins) and two 512GB sticks.
> 
> Maybe there is something wrong with the Bios settings?

Terabyte of memory... <drools at the thought>

I think you mean two 512MB sticks.  <g>  (Or just call them half-gig
sticks, that works too, and is what I've started doing.)

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman in
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html


-- 
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list


References:
x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
-- Simon Strandman
Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
-- Luke-Jr
Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
-- Olivier Crete
Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
-- Luke-Jr
Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
-- Duncan
Re: Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
-- Raffaele BELARDI
Re: Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
-- Michael Edwards
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-amd64: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
Next by thread:
Re: Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
Previous by date:
Re: Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
Next by date:
Re: Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-amd64 mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.