| 1 |
On 4/23/06, Kyle Lutze <kyle@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Duncan wrote: |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > It shouldn't therefore be entirely surprising that realtime-lsm and |
| 8 |
> > capacities conflict, as they are probably fighting for control of the same |
| 9 |
> > thing. Is it possible to use two different LSMs together in any case? I |
| 10 |
> > don't know, but it's evident that there's a conflict here. It appears you |
| 11 |
> > can use one or the other but not both at the same time. You plug in one, |
| 12 |
> > and it takes at least part of the interface the other one would plug |
| 13 |
> > into, so you can't plug in the other. |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> ahh the downfall of linux, people can't decide on one thing, so they |
| 17 |
> make two seperate ones, programs you use at the same time require both, |
| 18 |
> you get the shaft. Argg!!! |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Kyle |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Just keep in mind that LSM **IS** going away. It's not an IF, it's a WHEN. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Gentoo needs proper modern PAM support. Let's hope the developers will |
| 25 |
address this before we audio folks get stuck and have to find other |
| 26 |
solutions. There is a test ebuild for PAM out there but it's not part |
| 27 |
of portage. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
If anybody has need of newer version of PAM please let the devs know. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Cheers, |
| 32 |
Mark |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives