Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-amd64
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-amd64: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-amd64@g.o
From: "Kevin F. Quinn" <kevquinn@g.o>
Subject: Re: CFLAGS for Core2?
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:34:33 +0200
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 11:51:58 -0400
Brandon Edens <brandon@...> wrote:

> Using "tweaked out" USE flags will probably not result in hardware
> damage. You can break hardware but I don't think you're going to do
> it through USE flags.

1,$ s/USE/CFLAGS/g

USE flag combinations should be ok; if they're not then file a bug.
CFLAG problems on the other hand are not so easy to decide - many
compiler options are intended only to be used in specific
circumstances, not globally for everything.

-- 
Kevin F. Quinn
Attachment:
signature.asc (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: CFLAGS for Core2?
-- Brandon Edens
References:
CFLAGS for Core2?
-- Jack Lloyd
Re: CFLAGS for Core2?
-- Eric Augustus
Re: CFLAGS for Core2?
-- Brandon Edens
Re: CFLAGS for Core2?
-- Vladimir G. Ivanovic
Re: CFLAGS for Core2?
-- Brandon Edens
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-amd64: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: CFLAGS for Core2?
Next by thread:
Re: CFLAGS for Core2?
Previous by date:
Re: Re: vectorization (was: gcc4 CFLAGS)
Next by date:
Re: CFLAGS for Core2?


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-amd64 mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.