1 |
On 3/9/06, Marco Matthies <marco-ml@×××.net> wrote: |
2 |
> Thierry de Coulon wrote: |
3 |
> > I just came accross an article takling about a new program names |
4 |
> > "parallels" (www.parallels.com) that is supposed to do the same thing as |
5 |
> > vmware while being less expensive. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> You might also want to check out qemu[1], which is free and is in |
8 |
> portage -- the main difference is a somewhat more spartanic user interface. |
9 |
|
10 |
Interesting, but I wonder whether a guitar player / chip designer type |
11 |
guy could set it up? Spartanic is not generally a good environment for |
12 |
the likes of us. |
13 |
|
14 |
> |
15 |
> Just remember to use the kernel module kqemu as well for adequate speed |
16 |
> (somewhat less than vmware at the moment, but it is going to get to |
17 |
> vmware levels pretty soon). |
18 |
|
19 |
The web page say this module is closed source. If that's the case then |
20 |
why qemu vs. VMware vs. Parallels? |
21 |
|
22 |
Thanks. It's very intersting. How does this compare to BOCHS? |
23 |
|
24 |
Cheers, |
25 |
Mark |
26 |
> |
27 |
> [1] http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/ |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Marco |
30 |
> -- |
31 |
> gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
32 |
> |
33 |
> |
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |