| 1 |
Am Donnerstag, 2. Februar 2006 08:11 schrieb Duncan: |
| 2 |
> Bernhard Breinbauer posted <200602020724.41772.infopipe@×××.net>, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> excerpted below, on Thu, 02 Feb 2006 07:24:38 +0100: |
| 5 |
> > Am Mittwoch, 1. Februar 2006 21:16 schrieb Duncan: |
| 6 |
> >> > * A friend of mine was only able to compile xorg-server when dlloader |
| 7 |
> >> > useflag was set. |
| 8 |
> >> |
| 9 |
> >> ?? xorg-server is dlloader now by default. There's not a USE flag for |
| 10 |
> >> it any more. Still, it's likely many of the testers have it set so if |
| 11 |
> >> there's something strange that still tests for it... . |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > Yes, but it is still a USE flag for nvidia-glx, and without it linking of |
| 14 |
> > the xorg-server against the glx library failed. But we have to |
| 15 |
> > investigate further before we can say anything for sure. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> In that case, you are correct, it /would/ require that USE flag, since |
| 18 |
> xorg itself is normally built with dlloader now, no flag to choose. |
| 19 |
> NVidia would have to be built to load that way too, flag or no flag, or it |
| 20 |
> simply wouldn't work, and as it's still comtrolled by a flag, that flag |
| 21 |
> will have to be set, or it won't work. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> So... I'd say don't bother investigating. It has to be dlloader, and for |
| 24 |
> those still controlled with a flag, that means that flag has to be on. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
OK, I mentioned this solution on bug #111877, let's see if it helps those poor |
| 27 |
people :-) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
bernhard |
Archives