| 1 |
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Paul Stear <gentoo@××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi all, |
| 3 |
> I think I have a symbolic link problem. Any thought on how to solve this |
| 4 |
> error. |
| 5 |
... |
| 6 |
> unexpected reloc type in static binarymake[1]: *** [install-symbolic-link] |
| 7 |
... |
| 8 |
> LDFLAGS="-Wl,--as-needed,-O1 -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -Wl,--sort-common -s" |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
See this forum post: |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-6395405.html |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Seems your LDFLAGS may be the culprint. Specifically this part of |
| 15 |
ssuominen's post: |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
quote: |
| 18 |
-Wl,-s (or plain -s) breaks Portage's strip handling, |
| 19 |
FEATURES="nostrip", FEATURES="-nostrip". Also, toolchain packages, |
| 20 |
exactly like glibc handles stripping in very selective way -> Some of |
| 21 |
the installed binaries/libraries *can* be stripped, and some *cannot*. |
| 22 |
Just forcing stripping for everything is... like I said, insane |
Archives