Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-amd64
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-amd64: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-amd64@g.o
From: "Greg Bur" <greg.bur@...>
Subject: Re: Re: gcc 4.1 upgrade - bad desktop interactivity anyone?
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 03:39:05 -0400
On 9/14/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Mark Knecht</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:markknecht@...">markknecht@...</a>&gt; wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On 9/14/06, Duncan &lt;<a href="mailto:1i5t5.duncan@...">1i5t5.duncan@...</a>&gt; wrote:<br>&gt; &quot;Mark Knecht&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:markknecht@...">markknecht@...</a>&gt; posted<br>&gt; <a href="mailto:5bdc1c8b0609140715t2c135c9q50bf7ff8cbf1d82e@...">
5bdc1c8b0609140715t2c135c9q50bf7ff8cbf1d82e@...</a>, excerpted<br>&gt; below, on&nbsp;&nbsp;Thu, 14 Sep 2006 07:15:42 -0700:<br><br>2) What about building the kernel? How do the standard<br><br>make &amp;&amp; make modules_install
<br><br>command make any use of the flags in /etc/make.conf?</blockquote><div><br>I believe you have to modify the Makefile in /usr/src/linux to enable additional optimizations.&nbsp; I have noticed in recent kernels that there is an option to compile using -Os as well however I have not used that yet simply because I try to play it safe, especially with my kernels.&nbsp; I would be interested in hearing feedback as to which &quot;safe&quot; optimizations can be used when building a kernel.&nbsp; 
<br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">&nbsp;&nbsp; This machine is a fairly standard desktop running Xorg-7, Gnome and<br>just a few apps most of the time. However I am an audio oriented
</blockquote><div><br>I share your concern here as well.&nbsp; One app in particular that comes to mind is lyx which in the past has not gotten along well with heavy optimization, at least for me.&nbsp; Granted this was nearly two years ago when I, like many newcomers to Gentoo, got a bit ridiculous with the CFLAGS.&nbsp; Duncan's post was very educational and has made me reconsider trying additional optimizations again.&nbsp; I am definitely interested in hearing recommendations for proceeding even though like Mark I recently completed a rebuild of my system recently. I am looking forward to the continuation of this thread.
<br><br>Regards,<br><br>Greg<br>&nbsp;</div><br></div><br>
References:
gcc 4.1 upgrade - bad desktop interactivity anyone?
-- Mark Knecht
Re: gcc 4.1 upgrade - bad desktop interactivity anyone?
-- Duncan
Re: Re: gcc 4.1 upgrade - bad desktop interactivity anyone?
-- Mark Knecht
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-amd64: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: gcc 4.1 upgrade - bad desktop interactivity anyone?
Next by thread:
Re: gcc 4.1 upgrade - bad desktop interactivity anyone?
Previous by date:
Re: Re: Problems emerging Gnome
Next by date:
gcc4 CFLAGS Was: gcc 4.1 upgrade - bad desktop interactivity anyone?


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-amd64 mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.