Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-amd64
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-amd64: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-amd64@g.o
From: Ian McCulloch <ianmcc@...>
Subject: Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:36:25 +0200 (CEST)

On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Matt Randolph wrote:

> Sean Johnson wrote:
> 
> > LOL! 
> > That must be for the folk that don't mind patching glibc, but will get
> > upset if memcpy does strange things. :)
> > 
> > 
> 
> You try to do a good turn and they laugh at you.  That'll teach me.

Heh ;-)  I would like to see a version of memcpy.c that DOES do something 
malicious, without being completely obvious.  This isn't Windows, a 
seg-fault isn't going to take down the kernel, or corrupt the filesystem;)

Cheers
Ian
-- 
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list


Replies:
Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
-- Jared Lindsay
References:
x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
-- Simon Strandman
Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
-- Matt Randolph
Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
-- Matt Randolph
Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
-- Sean Johnson
Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
-- Matt Randolph
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-amd64: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
Next by thread:
Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
Previous by date:
Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
Next by date:
Re: no sound


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-amd64 mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.