1 |
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Matt Randolph wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Sean Johnson wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > LOL! |
6 |
> > That must be for the folk that don't mind patching glibc, but will get |
7 |
> > upset if memcpy does strange things. :) |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> |
11 |
> You try to do a good turn and they laugh at you. That'll teach me. |
12 |
|
13 |
Heh ;-) I would like to see a version of memcpy.c that DOES do something |
14 |
malicious, without being completely obvious. This isn't Windows, a |
15 |
seg-fault isn't going to take down the kernel, or corrupt the filesystem;) |
16 |
|
17 |
Cheers |
18 |
Ian |
19 |
-- |
20 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |