| 1 |
Same here for the USE flags. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
I'm also starting to get used to these kinds of problems with mod_php & |
| 4 |
apache. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Jared Lindsay wrote: |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 11:46:59 -0700 |
| 9 |
> From: Jared Lindsay <cinder.sub@×××××.com> |
| 10 |
> Reply-To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o |
| 11 |
> To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o |
| 12 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Yeah, netcat, hehe. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> emerge -pv netcat |
| 17 |
> ... |
| 18 |
> [ebuild N ] net-analyzer/netcat |
| 19 |
> [110-r8] -GAPING_SECURITY_HOLE +crypt -ipv6 |
| 20 |
> -static 107 kB |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> I would be interested in a USE flag for this glibc patch. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> On 7/31/05, Ben Skeggs <darktama@×××××××××.au> wrote: |
| 25 |
>> Duncan wrote: |
| 26 |
>> |
| 27 |
>>> Brian Hall posted <20050731085600.65fc8657.brihall@××××××.net>, excerpted |
| 28 |
>>> below, on Sun, 31 Jul 2005 08:56:00 -0600: |
| 29 |
>>> |
| 30 |
>>> |
| 31 |
>>> |
| 32 |
>>>> Perhaps a USE flag could be created to enable the glibc patches, then a |
| 33 |
>>>> emerge --newuse could recompile glibc and the problem apps (or |
| 34 |
>>>> everything); maybe a mini-howto document would also be helpful. |
| 35 |
>>>> |
| 36 |
>>>> I would certainly like an easy way to enable any "free" performance |
| 37 |
>>>> boost I can get! |
| 38 |
>>>> |
| 39 |
>>>> |
| 40 |
>>> |
| 41 |
>>> Something like USE=dangerous-amd64-hack? <g> |
| 42 |
>>> |
| 43 |
>>> (Seriously, there at least used to be a local use flag |
| 44 |
>>> USE=frickin-big-security-hole, or some such, on some app I can't remember |
| 45 |
>>> at the moment. Turns out a teacher was using that app in his class as a |
| 46 |
>>> an example or something, so the dev left the ability to create it there, |
| 47 |
>>> but with a USE flag nobody in their right mind would normally enable. I |
| 48 |
>>> wish I could remember what it was, but grepping use.local.desc for |
| 49 |
>>> anything that might be related doesn't seem to bring it up. Perhaps the |
| 50 |
>>> app, or anyway the USE flag, has now been removed from portage?) |
| 51 |
>>> |
| 52 |
>>> The use.local.desc description could point to the bug, which is IIRC what |
| 53 |
>>> the one above did, for those wanting more information about just why such |
| 54 |
>>> a USE flag exists, and just why someone might be persuaded to enable it. |
| 55 |
>>> |
| 56 |
>>> |
| 57 |
>>> |
| 58 |
>> Are you talking about GAPING_SECURITY_HOLE? If so, this flag is still |
| 59 |
>> in use by the net-analyzer/netcat package. It enables the "-E" (iirc) |
| 60 |
>> switch |
| 61 |
>> which allows you to do something like: |
| 62 |
>> nc -l -p 12345 -E /bin/bash |
| 63 |
>> |
| 64 |
>> This(or something close to it) would cause netcat to listen on port 12345, |
| 65 |
>> and forward the person who connects to it a nice bash shell. |
| 66 |
>> |
| 67 |
>> Ben. |
| 68 |
>> -- |
| 69 |
>> gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
| 70 |
>> |
| 71 |
>> |
| 72 |
> |
| 73 |
> |
| 74 |
-- |
| 75 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives