1 |
On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 10:45 +0000, Gavin Seddon wrote: |
2 |
> That's valuable info. These dual core amd's are on ebay for |
3 |
> 'next-to-nothing', pls tell me more, what are the PPC machines, I have |
4 |
> seen PPC to be an option for a Gentoo dist. but didn't know what it is. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > There's a reason that Itinium was called the Itanic.... It's probably |
7 |
> > the biggest waste of effort Intel and HP have ever embarked on. Next to |
8 |
> > no-one supports it, and it's special features arn't really all that |
9 |
> > special compared to the average Opteron. If you want the most |
10 |
> > robust/fastest chipset, Power chips are the way to go. (Not Power PC |
11 |
> > (PPC), just Power chips). A workstation running dual Power5 chips would |
12 |
> > more or less obliterate anything you could care to throw at it. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > If you're strictly speaking of the x86 world of chips (Which btw the |
15 |
> > Itanium isn't really more then >85% compatible) then the dual core |
16 |
> > socket 940 opterons are still the best chip, followed by the dual core |
17 |
> > socket 939 Athlon 64s. If you are running a rack or thirty of blades, |
18 |
> > the difference between the IA64 and the AMD64 heat output and wattage |
19 |
> > ingestion more then pays for itself. Performance wise, the Opterons are |
20 |
> > also far enough ahead of the Intel offerings to make it worthwhile to |
21 |
> > stick with AMD. |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > YMMV and My opinions are my own. |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> -- |
26 |
> Dr Gavin Seddon |
27 |
> School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences |
28 |
> University of Manchester |
29 |
> Oxford Road, Manchester |
30 |
> M13 9PL, U.K. |
31 |
> |
32 |
PPC is the chip-set formerly used by Apple aka G4 & G5. They run slower |
33 |
then an x86 chip-set, but pack more into each cycle (For more info on |
34 |
that look up the RISC vs. CISC debate/comparisons such as here: |
35 |
http://cse.stanford.edu/class/sophomore-college/projects-00/risc/risccisc/ ). Generally speaking, with software designed for it, a G5 2.1 GHz is roughly equivalent in power to a ~AMD64 3000+. |
36 |
|
37 |
However, you'll note I suggested the Power chip, not the Power PC chip. |
38 |
The Power chip is a series of chips designed and manufactured by IBM for |
39 |
use in heavy workstations and servers. The current generation of the |
40 |
Power series is called the Power5.(Links to press nause: |
41 |
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/p/news/pressreleases/2005/oct/annc_1004.html & http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/rd/494/mackerras.html) I don't know if Gentoo supports the Power series of chips, but I do know that IBM has gotten SuSE and RedHat (at minimum) ported onto it (More useful links: http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/power/articles.html ). |
42 |
|
43 |
Hope this helps. |
44 |
|
45 |
B. Vance |
46 |
|
47 |
|
48 |
|
49 |
-- |
50 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |