Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Karol Krizka <kkrizka@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 17:04:33
Message-Id: ac342b0a0508011003686becfc@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc. by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 On 8/1/05, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote:
2 > Jan Jitse Venselaar posted <200508011105.14688.janjitse@×××××.com>,
3 > excerpted below, on Mon, 01 Aug 2005 11:04:38 +0200:
4 >
5 > > As the reporter of the problem with nano, I'd like to make 1 correction to
6 > > this report: Recompiling nano and its depencies did not fix the crashes. It
7 > > just fixed the eating of the file.
8 >
9 > Thanks for the correction.
10 >
11 I am just compiling my amd64 laptop from stage1 again, but this time I
12 applied the patches right in the beginning. Nano seems to run fine so
13 far (in chroot), so how do you get the crashes? I tried searching as
14 mentioned in the abose post.
15
16 > > I did not recompile my entire system, but a crash of such a small and basic
17 > > app as nano made me not want to do this outside of a chroot, which I
18 > > currently do not have the means for.
19 >
20 > A rather good point. Of course, some of us like living on the edge <g>,
21 > but it's still something I'd not add as a dev, certainly not unless it was
22 > linked to some sort of local
23 > USE=this-might-kill-your-children-and-eat-their-flesh type of USE flag! <g>
24 >
25 > (OK, s/children/files/, s/their-flesh/your-disk/, but you get the point...)
26 >
27 > Never-the-less, I added the strings patch here, and have the new KDE 3.4.2
28 > stuff at least, compiled against it... Computing is my hobby; if I
29 > wanted something that would predictably "just work", I'd be doing TiVos or
30 > the like! Much of the fun is the occasional breakage in mysterious ways,
31 > never knowing quite when it'll happen, and the challenge of figuring out
32 > how to get back to a working system, again!
33 >
34 So if you wanted something to just work you would be running Linux on
35 TiVo? I think a intel computer would be better for that...
36
37 > --
38 > Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
39 > "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
40 > and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in
41 > http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html
42 >
43 >
44 > --
45 > gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list
46 >
47 >
48
49
50 --
51 Cheers,
52 Karol Krizka
53
54 --
55 gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc. Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>