1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
Sven Köhler wrote: |
4 |
> i was amazed to see, that there is a profile for 32bit userland on amd64 |
5 |
> hosts. Is there some FAQ somewhere? |
6 |
|
7 |
No. |
8 |
|
9 |
> - what is the goal for that? (well, my personal goal would be, to have a |
10 |
> 32-bit system so that i can use all that pre-compiled software that's |
11 |
> not available in amd64 yet - and well, no multilib anymore) |
12 |
|
13 |
It's meant to be a developing profile. Portage does not yet handle ABI-dependant |
14 |
dependencies, but we want to work on the 32bit side of things nevertheless. |
15 |
|
16 |
-- |
17 |
$ cat profiles/default-linux/amd64/2006.0/32bit-userland/README |
18 |
|
19 |
Disclaimer: Don't even think about using this profile outside a chroot. |
20 |
All problems related to the profile should block tracker bug #124816. |
21 |
|
22 |
Since getting this profile running with a stage3 is rather... "tricky", |
23 |
I've put together an experimental stage: |
24 |
|
25 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~blubb/32bit-userland.tar.bz2 |
26 |
|
27 |
Have fun! |
28 |
-- |
29 |
|
30 |
In other words: It's a great way to mess up your box *very* fast. It won't even |
31 |
let you do `emerge -e system` yet. If you feel like digging around in mud, |
32 |
contact me off-list and I'll give you some pointers. But don't file bugs without |
33 |
having a patch ready, we're simply not there yet. |
34 |
|
35 |
> - what is the performance drawback? (does a 64bit kernel run the 32bit |
36 |
> binaries as fast as a 32bit kernel?) |
37 |
|
38 |
Performance doesn't matter in a developing profile, but it should be about |
39 |
equally fast for most things. |
40 |
|
41 |
> - Are there any major advantages on having a 64bit kernel? (The only |
42 |
> advantage i see is, that you don't run into HIGHMEM-troubles.) |
43 |
|
44 |
No. |
45 |
|
46 |
-- |
47 |
Kind Regards, |
48 |
|
49 |
Simon Stelling |
50 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Developer |
51 |
-- |
52 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |