Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-amd64
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-amd64: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-amd64@g.o
From: Daiajo Tibdixious <daiajo@...>
Subject: Re: gcc wants emul libc.so.6
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 23:26:38 +1100
On 1/9/06, Daiajo Tibdixious <daiajo@...> wrote:
> On 1/9/06, Harm Geerts <harmgeerts@...> wrote:
> > On Monday 09 January 2006 10:51, Daiajo Tibdixious wrote:
> > > # emerge --ask --verbose gcc
> > >
> > > These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
> > >
> > > Calculating dependencies ...done!
> > > [ebuild  N    ] sys-devel/gcc-3.4.4-r1  (-altivec) -bootstrap
> > > -boundschecking -build +fortran -gcj +gtk -hardened -ip28 -mudflap
> > > (-multilib) +multislot (-n32) (-n64) +nls -nocxx -nopie -nossp -objc
> > > -objc-gc -vanilla 0 kB
> > >
> > > fails with this error
> > >   /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: cannot find
> > > /emul/linux/x86/lib/libc.so.6
> > >
> > > # equery belongs libc.so.6
> > > Searching for file 'libc.so.6' in *...
> > > sys-libs/glibc-2.3.5-r2 (/lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.3.5.so)
> > > # ls -l /lib/libc.so.6
> > > lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 13 Jan  3 20:27 /lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.3.5.so
> > >
> > > I tried linking this file into the emul directory - it is ignored
> > > since its 64 bit
> > > # file /lib/libc-2.3.5.so
> > > /lib/libc-2.3.5.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, AMD x86-64, version
> > > 1 (SYSV), stripped
> > >
> > > I expected to find the file in one of the emul-linux-x86-* I emerged
> > > baselibs, glibc, gtklibs, & qtlibs with no joy.
> > > Googling turned up similar problems but no solution.
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-amd64@g.o/msg02747.html
> > They weren't kidding ;)
> > --
>
> When I ugraded to 2005.0, gcc 3.4.4-r1 was working fine.
> Yours truely did the most stupid thing and ummerged gcc, crippling
> python and hence all of portage. I recoverd via the how-to
> specifically for this. Of cousrse there was no binary for gcc 3.4.4 so
> I immediately tried to emerge it.
>
> This is not an upgrade problem, its a dufus admin (me) problem.
>
> BTW the emul-linux-x86-glibc ebuild says "32bit libc is now provided
> by sys-libs/glibc."
> however I can't emerge glibc because it depends on gcc 3.4.4 which needs
> glibc.
> A catch 22.
>
> I need a binary glibc 2.3.5-r2

Found a binary
  http://chinstrap.alternating.net/files/2005.0/grp/i686/glibc-2.3.5-r2.tbz2
(no 386 there)
only needed 2 files
  libc-2.3.5.so
  # ln -s libc-2.3.5.so libc.so.6
  libc_nonshared.a
now gcc fails with
checking for library containing gettext... configure: error: Link
tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES.
make[1]: *** [configure-target-libstdc++-v3] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.4.4-r1/work/build'
make: *** [profiledbootstrap] Error 2

!!! ERROR: sys-devel/gcc-3.4.4-r1 failed.
!!! Function gcc_do_make, Line 1319, Exitcode 2
!!! emake failed with profiledbootstrap

Anyway 23:30 here, probably obvious in the morning.

-- 
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list


Replies:
Re: Re: gcc wants emul libc.so.6
-- Domingo Suárez
Re: Re: gcc wants emul libc.so.6
-- Harm Geerts
References:
gcc wants emul libc.so.6
-- Daiajo Tibdixious
Re: gcc wants emul libc.so.6
-- Harm Geerts
Re: gcc wants emul libc.so.6
-- Daiajo Tibdixious
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-amd64: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: gcc wants emul libc.so.6
Next by thread:
Re: Re: gcc wants emul libc.so.6
Previous by date:
Re: gcc wants emul libc.so.6
Next by date:
Re: Re: gcc wants emul libc.so.6


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-amd64 mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.