| 1 |
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:58:17 +0100, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
| 2 |
Duncan, |
| 3 |
<snip> |
| 4 |
>> CFLAGS="-Os -march=k8 -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs -mmmx -msse3 -pipe |
| 5 |
>> -fomit-frame-pointer" |
| 6 |
A couple of years ago I had all kinds of trouble with my amd64 system. In |
| 7 |
one of the replies to my request for help, it was suggested that I use the |
| 8 |
CFLAGS listed. I am not cleaver enough to know what they do but I haven't |
| 9 |
had many problems since using them. I'm sorry but I can not remember the |
| 10 |
experts name -- I thought it was you. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I have just run the glibc update with MAKEOPTS=-j1 and have the same error |
| 13 |
to do with symlinks. |
| 14 |
I'm sure that some time ago their was an update symlinks checker, but I |
| 15 |
can't find it. Any ideas? |
| 16 |
Paul |
| 17 |
<snip> |
| 18 |
> Meanwhile, AFAIK entirely unrelated to your problem but I'm curious as I |
| 19 |
> always like to see what other people have in their CFLAGS when I have a |
| 20 |
> chance, why are you using -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs ? I don't see |
| 21 |
> anything |
| 22 |
> in the gcc manpage info on that machine/arch-flag to suggest why I might |
| 23 |
> wish to disable it, and it seems a rather odd arch-flag to simply throw |
| 24 |
> in |
| 25 |
> at random, so I'm wondering what the reasoning is. I'm definitely NOT |
| 26 |
> saying it's wrong. Quite the contrary; with a bit more info, I might |
| 27 |
> find |
| 28 |
> it useful here... or not, but I don't know at this point. So got a link |
| 29 |
> or something I could read? |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ |
Archives