On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote:
> On Friday 30 May 2008 21:16:06 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, Duncan wrote:
> > > I've not done paludis due to its lack of binary package support.  Even
> > > tho I'm running only a single computer
> >
> > there is another reason not to use paludis:
> >
> > you can't go back.
> >
> > At least not easily.
>
> That is a vicious, ridiculous lie (and the rest only gets worse).

http://www.gentooexperimental.org/not-the-gwn/not-the-gwn-current.html

for some numbers.

typical paludis-supporter behaviour:
http://r0bertz.blogspot.com/2007/01/be-careful-when-you-are-on-paludis.html

ciaranm, known to game the system. Abusive against users.
rbrown&spb, just removed because of their abusive behaviour.

And think about that: why is there a whole bunch of paludis support threads in 
f.g.o?

And why is there not one for pkgcore? (hint, because it is so easy to use)
-- 
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list