| 1 |
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
<SNIP> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I'm thinking, AT THE MOMENT, of going multilib and grub-static. That way |
| 5 |
> down the road, I can switch to no-multilib and not have to reinstall grub. |
| 6 |
> To simple huh? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Dale |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Sounds like things are still in flux somewhere. ;-) ;-) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I think multilib for now is really best. Once I thought I'd do what |
| 13 |
you outline above. After a while I decided I'm not using my computer |
| 14 |
to make a political statement and why change. It's not important to me |
| 15 |
and 32-bit support gives you options even if you don't use them. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
There are other things that haven't been discussed like running a |
| 18 |
chroot with 32-bit or VMWare running 32-bit Windows. I have no idea |
| 19 |
how the multilib/no-multilib thing effects those and why do I care? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I certainly don't remember any problems specifically caused by |
| 22 |
multilib bringing down a 64-bit system so why not run it? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
You'll be happy. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
- Mark |
Archives