1 |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
2 |
Gentoo Linux Security Advisory GLSA 200602-10 |
3 |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
4 |
http://security.gentoo.org/ |
5 |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
6 |
|
7 |
Severity: Normal |
8 |
Title: GnuPG: Incorrect signature verification |
9 |
Date: February 18, 2006 |
10 |
Bugs: #122721 |
11 |
ID: 200602-10 |
12 |
|
13 |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
14 |
|
15 |
Synopsis |
16 |
======== |
17 |
|
18 |
Applications relying on GnuPG to authenticate digital signatures may |
19 |
incorrectly believe a signature has been verified. |
20 |
|
21 |
Background |
22 |
========== |
23 |
|
24 |
GnuPG (The GNU Privacy Guard) is a free replacement for PGP (Pretty |
25 |
Good Privacy). As GnuPG does not rely on any patented algorithms, it |
26 |
can be used without any restrictions. gpgv is the OpenPGP signature |
27 |
verification tool provided by the GnuPG system. |
28 |
|
29 |
Affected packages |
30 |
================= |
31 |
|
32 |
------------------------------------------------------------------- |
33 |
Package / Vulnerable / Unaffected |
34 |
------------------------------------------------------------------- |
35 |
1 app-crypt/gnupg < 1.4.2.1 >= 1.4.2.1 |
36 |
|
37 |
Description |
38 |
=========== |
39 |
|
40 |
Tavis Ormandy of the Gentoo Linux Security Auditing Team discovered |
41 |
that automated systems relying on the return code of GnuPG or gpgv to |
42 |
authenticate digital signatures may be misled by malformed signatures. |
43 |
GnuPG documentation states that a return code of zero (0) indicates |
44 |
success, however gpg and gpgv may also return zero if no signature data |
45 |
was found in a detached signature file. |
46 |
|
47 |
Impact |
48 |
====== |
49 |
|
50 |
An attacker may be able to bypass authentication in automated systems |
51 |
relying on the return code of gpg or gpgv to authenticate digital |
52 |
signatures. |
53 |
|
54 |
Workaround |
55 |
========== |
56 |
|
57 |
There is no known workaround at this time. |
58 |
|
59 |
Resolution |
60 |
========== |
61 |
|
62 |
All GnuPG users should upgrade to the latest version: |
63 |
|
64 |
# emerge --sync |
65 |
# emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose ">=app-crypt/gnupg-1.4.2.1" |
66 |
|
67 |
References |
68 |
========== |
69 |
|
70 |
[ 1 ] GnuPG Security Announcement |
71 |
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2006q1/000211.html |
72 |
[ 2 ] CVE-2006-0455 |
73 |
http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-0455 |
74 |
|
75 |
Availability |
76 |
============ |
77 |
|
78 |
This GLSA and any updates to it are available for viewing at |
79 |
the Gentoo Security Website: |
80 |
|
81 |
http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200602-10.xml |
82 |
|
83 |
Concerns? |
84 |
========= |
85 |
|
86 |
Security is a primary focus of Gentoo Linux and ensuring the |
87 |
confidentiality and security of our users machines is of utmost |
88 |
importance to us. Any security concerns should be addressed to |
89 |
security@g.o or alternatively, you may file a bug at |
90 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org. |
91 |
|
92 |
License |
93 |
======= |
94 |
|
95 |
Copyright 2006 Gentoo Foundation, Inc; referenced text |
96 |
belongs to its owner(s). |
97 |
|
98 |
The contents of this document are licensed under the |
99 |
Creative Commons - Attribution / Share Alike license. |
100 |
|
101 |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0 |