Gentoo Archives: gentoo-catalyst

From: Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>
To: gentoo-catalyst@l.g.o
Cc: "W. Trevor King" <wking@×××××××.us>, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>, Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] [PATCH 0/2] Blacklisting binary packages
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:36:04
Message-Id: CAEdQ38GY=oiWLeah4h=4x45LH73qUZeT7q6N6RfuG2iVRh7BUQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-catalyst] [PATCH 0/2] Blacklisting binary packages by "W. Trevor King"
1 On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:42 PM, W. Trevor King <wking@×××××××.us> wrote:
2 > From: "W. Trevor King" <wking@×××××××.us>
3
4 I feel like this is getting out of control.
5
6 There seems to be this overwhelming desire to keep applying hack after
7 hack to make increasingly obscure -- and fundamentally unsupportable
8 -- configurations work.
9
10 Brian mentioned that he talked to Zac and that there was something
11 that portage should be doing differently about binary packages. Let's
12 please investigate that a bit further before pursuing other
13 strategies. I have confidence that if Zac understands and knows about
14 the problem that he can fix portage.
15
16 Brian, Zac: do we have a bug filed? What's the status -- do we have a
17 good understanding of what's required?
18
19 Thanks,
20 Matt

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-catalyst] [PATCH 0/2] Blacklisting binary packages "W. Trevor King" <wking@×××××××.us>