1 |
On May 2, 2008, at 5:03 PM, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 10:20 +0800, Max Arnold wrote: |
4 |
>>>>> Sure. In fact, I have 2 different "host types" right now, a |
5 |
>>>>> "master" |
6 |
>>>>> and a "build host" though they can reside on the same machine. |
7 |
>>>> |
8 |
>>>> Which roles they have? |
9 |
>>> |
10 |
>>> I'm not sure that I follow. Are you asking what specific tasks |
11 |
>>> would be |
12 |
>>> performed by the roles above? |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> Yes, what specific tasks would be performed by these host types and |
15 |
>> what are benefits of such distinction? |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> I guess a "master" purpose is to serve updates, or things are more |
18 |
>> tricky? |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Yeah, you're thinking way too small. ;] |
21 |
> |
22 |
> The master server will be the control interface for custom profiles |
23 |
> and |
24 |
> binary repositories, which are built by the build servers. It will |
25 |
> (eventually) also be the configuration engine for each server. I hope |
26 |
> to eventually have a complete system capable of controlling a Gentoo |
27 |
> system from birth to death, from a centralized location. |
28 |
|
29 |
Is there any public repository where you are developing this stuff in ? |
30 |
I'd like to contribute if possible. |
31 |
|
32 |
Additionally I'd be interested in your ideas on managing the |
33 |
configuration from this master host.... |
34 |
We're currently using puppet for that which works fine for us, curious |
35 |
why you'd want to re-implement either puppet of cf-engine. |
36 |
|
37 |
Ramon |
38 |
-- |
39 |
gentoo-catalyst@l.g.o mailing list |