1 |
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Sebastian Pipping <sping@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> Hello! |
3 |
> |
4 |
> |
5 |
> The current process of copying changes from 2.x to 3.x or vice versa is |
6 |
> suboptimal, especially with no recent merge commit around. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I would like to start this thread to list and discuss differences |
9 |
> between catalyst 2.x and 3.x so we can then decide what needs to be |
10 |
> merged in which direction and then have a single branch soon (ideally) |
11 |
> or at least two branches with clear and to-the-point diffs. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Difference I have noticed (without searching) so far: |
14 |
> |
15 |
> - Subarch "sh4aeb" is not supported on 3.x but 2.x |
16 |
> |
17 |
> - Folder ./arch of 2.x is ./modules/catalyst/arch in 3.x |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Please add any differences you are aware of. Many thanks! |
20 |
|
21 |
As an aside, patches should go into master first, and cherry-picked |
22 |
back to catalyst_2, not the other way around. |
23 |
|
24 |
Matt |