1 |
Second try as a new thread: |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
On 06/27/2011 05:58 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: |
5 |
> We use 2.0.6.916 on official releng releases. |
6 |
> I tried 9999 on my private tests because [..] |
7 |
|
8 |
To me that leaves the question who uses 9999 for serious stuff at all. |
9 |
In case it's no one (which we should find out) we could trash that |
10 |
branch and fully concentrate on calalyst_2. |
11 |
|
12 |
I guess that sounds a bit radical at first. It doesn't have to be a |
13 |
quick decision. Also, version control allows us to bring it back if needed. |
14 |
|
15 |
Ideas on find out who is using 9999: |
16 |
|
17 |
- Removing 9999 ebuild from the tree and see who's complaining |
18 |
|
19 |
- Resetting branch master to nothing but a README announcing |
20 |
the possible death of that thread and a request to join |
21 |
this mailing list and speak up about it if there is need. |
22 |
|
23 |
- Asking on one/some/all of gentoo-dev, gentoo-user, gentoo forums, |
24 |
planet gentoo. |
25 |
|
26 |
After such action I imagine a time window of 2 to 4 weeks to give people |
27 |
a chance to react. |
28 |
|
29 |
What do you think? |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
> I can confirm that the build with the master branch fails as it doesn't |
33 |
> seem able to find the spec files or doesn't accept them - the official |
34 |
> ones we use to build weekly releases. |
35 |
|
36 |
That seems to further decrease the chance that someone is using 9999 for |
37 |
real to me. |
38 |
|
39 |
Best, |
40 |
|
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
Sebastian |